News
Autism
and Vaccines
by Tim O'Shea, DC
http://www.mercola.com/2001/mar/7/autism_vaccines.htm
This
article is excerpted from Dr. O'Shea's forthcoming
third edition of the Sanctity of Human Blood.
Perhaps
one of the most shocking pieces ever to appear on
television this past April: a six-hour taping of
a Congressional investigation into the relationship
between vaccines and autism among American children.
This footage appeared on C-SPAN and was then archived
on their website for a entire month.
On
April 6, 2000 Rep. Dan Burton convened the Congressional
hearing in which parents repeatedly told similar
stories - how their normally developing babies, after
MMR or DPT vaccinations, began displaying autistic
behaviors, conditions that are often permanent.
Happy,
bright children were suddenly losing their abilities
to learn, communicate or even recognize their parents.
Amazing
testimony was given by experts in the field of autism:
Mary
Megson,MD,
Explained
how autism has gone from being rare (about one incident
per 10,000 children in 1978), to epidemic proportions
in 2000 AD:
one
case in every 300-500 children in many areas!
Megson's
research has shown total deficiency of vitamin A
in almost all autistic children.
What
depletes the body of vitamin A at 15 months?
The
MMR vaccine.
In
addition, Megson found that pertussis toxin from
the DPT shot disrupted a certain protein that is
necessary for retinal formation. This would account
for the prevalence of night-blindness and loss of
3D vision so common among autistics.
John
O'Leary,PhD
A
world-class researcher and molecular biologist from
Ireland, using state-of-the-art sequencing technology,
showed how he had found the measles virus in the
gut of 96% of autistic children, compared to 6.6%
in normal children. This virus did not come from
the natural disease, but from the measles vaccine.
Dr.
O'Leary found measles virus present in 75% of children
with Crohn's disease. Crohn's has traditionally been
an intestinal disease of adults, following years
of dietary abuse. Its appearance in children is a
new event, and Dr. O'Leary's work points to the measles
virus from vaccines as the likely cause.
V.
Singh, MDM
A
specialist from Utah State who has studied over 400
cases of autism, found that these children had experienced
an autoimmune episode, in which their own bodies
had been made to attack the linings of their nervous
systems. Dr. Singh characterized the epidemic as
a "hyperimmune response to the measles virus."
He
stated that 55% of the families said that autism
appeared soon after an MMR shot, and that 33% of
families said it appeared soon after a DPT shot.
Such
neurologic damage is a well-established side-effect
of the mercury, aluminum, and formaldehyde used in
these vaccines.
Andrew
Wakefield, MD
A
brilliant researcher from the UK, noted an almost
100% incidence of "lymphoid nodular hyperplasia" or
swollen lumps throughout the intestinal tissue of
autistics. Such a condition is rare in normal children.
Intestinal pathology is characteristic of the autistic
child, and the condition generally follows soon after
the MMR shot.
Dr.
Wakefield explained that as the fragile, newborn
intestine cannot function because of its swollen
condition, undigested toxins from vaccines and drugs
are allowed to get into the liver, which is also
in a formative stage.
Liver
pathology is very common among autistics. Wakefield's
hypothesis is that these same "undegraded toxins," having
not been halted by the intestine or the liver, as
normally happens, that these toxins are then free
to attack the nervous system, and that autism may
well be the result.
Kathy
Pratt, PhD
Director
of the Indiana Center for Autism, stated that 1 in
400 children in Indiana were autistic! With 500,000
cases reported in the U.S., Dr. Pratt stated that
autism is now more common than Down's syndrome. Dr.
Pratt points out that autism presently may disqualify
a person for medical coverage for other, unrelated
conditions.
Michael
Goldberg, MD
A
California pediatrician and researcher, explained
how it was impossible to have an epidemic based solely
on genetics. That's the standard excuse the CDC and
the NIH have been using to explain how autism has
grown from 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 300 in just 22 years.
Seeing
the American democratic system in action in a live
Congressional hearing, it soon becomes apparent how
the control of information operates, even in the
face of overwhelming scientific evidence that we
may well be poisoning our own children!
Colleen
Boyle was there to represent the Centers for Disease
Control. After stumbling through her prepared statement
in which she denied any connection between autism
and vaccines, Boyle stated the present incidence
to be "12 in 10,000." Burton then stopped
her cold by asking her one simple question:
Did
she think it was a conflict of interest for the same
people who were funded by the vaccine manufacturers
to be on the advisory board making decisions about
which vaccines should be given to American children?
Boyle
was dumfounded and speechless. Burton repeated the
question. Still no answer. Boyle's mute portrayal
of the career bureaucrat spoke volumes.
Equally
inept and ill-prepared was Deborah Hirtz, MD, representing
the National Institutes of Health. Losing her place
in her written statement, Hirtz forgot what she was
saying, and it seemed obvious she had not written
it. Finally, she just barely managed to put across
what she was sent there to say - that there could
be no connection between vaccines and autism, but
that the NIH was "looking into it."
The
NIH has already spent some $40 million per year of
taxpayer money "looking into it." (Hirtz)
Their answer: It needs further study. The performance
of these representatives from the two government
agencies who have almost sovereign power in the area
of vaccines was frightening - their indifference;
lack of information; condescension; and low level
of intelligence.
They
gave no sign of having understood one word of the
critically important breakthrough research that had
just been so brilliantly expounded by Drs. Megson,
O'Leary, and Wakefield. This is what power looks
like - people who have been in their position so
long that they know they don't have to justify themselves
to anyone lower down on the food chain.
Government
agencies have the same answer to every problem: more
committees; more money; more study; and more meetings.
Meanwhile, 22 years have gone by, and all these people
say is "we don't know."
After
22 years and $100 million, we don't know the incidence,
the cause or the cure for autism. But we'll definitely "look
into it." And, oh yes, it's definitely "not
vaccines."
This
is the thinking that passes as logic. The key point
here that no one seems to be pointing out is that
research should be done before mandating a vaccine
into the bloodstream of American children! You don't
just start mass-injecting something into a population
and then stand back and defy independent scientists
to prove it isn't safe! That's exactly what we've
done here.
As
a nation, as a government, and as parents, Americans
should be very certain, beyond a reasonable doubt,
that any substance being injected into an unformed
little nervous system is absolutely safe and does
no harm. That should be the minimum requirement.
Drs.
Wakefield, O'Leary, and Megson have shown startling
results from some of the only scientific research
on autism and vaccines in the entire world that has
not been funded by the vaccine manufacturers. This
research also shows a high likelihood that MMR and
DPT vaccines may cause permanent intestinal destruction,
liver damage, and autism. It presents a very plausible
hypothesis for the horrific increase of autism since
1978. So, until we know for certain if they're right,
why are the vaccines not suspended?
Researcher
Gary Null's pert answer comes swimming to the surface; "It's
the money, stupid." By the end of the hearing,
Burton's room was polarized into three groups:
Despite
Burton's heroic efforts to bring these matters into
public view, it's an uphill struggle. The big money's
on the side of vaccines. Big money controls research,
the press, "scientific" journals, and politicians.
Seeing all these forces clash together in one room
in just six hours has been the most instructive display
of confusing the issues perhaps since the OJ trial.
Watching
a live congressional hearing like this, it soon becomes
clear that for them, the real priority isn't necessarily
finding the truth, but rather showing who's really
in charge here. The viewer begins to understand how
autism could have gone from being unknown in 1978
to being a household word in just 22 years with so
little fanfare.
The
researchers who have unlimited funding may 'prove'
whatever they wish, get it published in the best
journals, which are heavily advertised in by the
drug companies, and then refuse to respond to valid
objections, because they know that those opposing
points of view will probably not be published.
Despite
these formidable obstacles, doubts are creeping into
the overall public "consciousness" from
many different directions about the safety of vaccines.
At one in 500, the fact of autism as an epidemic
can no longer be covered up.
The
work of Wakefield, O'Leary, and Megson is going to
be very difficult to explain away. The massive advertising
campaign about the safety of vaccines in the popular
media, which is certain to be stepped up in the next
few months, is going to look very hollow in the light
of clean, unbiased research that is not funded by
parties who stand to make billions from certain predetermined
results.